Compare › Head to head
Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 vs Bluetti AC180
Choose the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 for
output, surge, weight, solar, wall charging, battery life
The differences that matter
- Bluetti AC180 stores 13% more energy (1,152 vs 1,024 Wh).
- Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 can power 2,000W of devices at once vs 1,800W.
- Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 handles bigger motor start-ups (3,000W vs 2,700W surge).
- Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 is lighter: 24.9 lb vs 35.2 lb.
- Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 recharges faster from solar (600W vs 500W max input).
- Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 charges faster from the wall (~49 vs ~70 min).
- Bluetti AC180 costs less per Wh ($0.43 vs $0.49).
- Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 is rated for more charge cycles (4,000 vs 3,500).
- Bluetti AC180 can grow larger with add-on batteries (up to 1,152 Wh).
Runtime side by side
| Running just this | SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 | AC180 |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerator (full-size) | 16.6 hrs | 18.7 hrs |
| CPAP (no humidifier) | 21.8 hrs | 24.5 hrs |
| TV (55-inch LED) | 8.7 hrs | 9.8 hrs |
| Microwave (1000W) | 35 min | 39 min |
Full specs
| Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 | Bluetti AC180 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 1,024 Wh | 1,152 Wh |
| Continuous AC output | 2,000 W | 1,800 W |
| Surge / peak output | 3,000 W | 2,700 W |
| Weight | 24.9 lb | 35.2 lb |
| Max solar input | 600 W | 500 W |
| Wall charge time (0–100%) | ~49 min | ~70 min |
| Battery chemistry | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Rated cycles | 4,000+ | 3,500+ |
| Expandable to | Not expandable | Not expandable |
| AC voltage | 120V | 120V |
| UPS / pass-through | Yes | Yes |
| Typical sale price | $499 | $499 |
| Price per Wh | $0.49 | $0.43 |